So there's currently a series of filmed musicals doing the rounds of British cinemas; Kinky Boots (really not our thing), Titanic (someone thought it was a good idea to make a musical about the Titanic?), 42nd Street (also so not our thing for different reasons) and An American in Paris. We have been bombarded with trailers for these every time we've been to the cinema since Christmas and I wouldn't have taken a lot of notice except that I've never seen the original film of An American in Paris and the dancing in the trailer looked wonderful. So I suggested we go, and we did.
Musicals are a bit weird aren't they? I've been struggling over the last few days to try and put my finger on exactly why I should think musicals are weird but accept opera at face value and I finally did. It's because the dialogue in musicals is so stilted. It's there to carry on the plot and tee the audience up for the next big song, but it conveys only information and not emotion. In this a musical is different from a play, where the dialogue does both jobs, and opera where the music does both jobs, or at least the words and music are so closely aligned that you can't tell where one ends and the other begins. Musicals break that old adage of writing, 'don't tell, show' because in a musical the dialogue is all about the telling.
Having ,after many years, finally 'got' ballet I found the dances in this film very 'unsatisfying'. Ballet style, but not speaking the way a proper ballet does.
ReplyDeleteTitanic...the Musical?????
ReplyDeleteCrumbs.
The older I get the less things interest me! I used to mildly 'enjoy' the odd musical (other than Joseph and his Coat which I loathe and despise and hate due to excessive exposure one year) but they no longer interest me. Daughter went to see Hamilton live - she'd made me watch the film some time back - nope, boring. Mind, I'm not keen on opera either (sorry Anne) other than G and S!
ReplyDelete