So, what did I read in January? I ' finished ' seven books - the reason for the ' ' will become apparent.
I continue to read any J D Kirk that comes my way via my two libraries and I think a 99p Kindle Daily deal this month too. This means I am not reading them in order which is not ideal but I'm not that bothered. I should however try not to read too many of them all at once or I shall O/D and get sick of them. That's easier said than done though when you're prowling the library shelves and find one you haven't already read. So this month I read A Litter of Bones, which is actually Book 1, and shows it, the first in a series can sometimes be a bit below par as the author finds their feet, and Come Hell or High Water which is somewhat further through.
I have already mentioned/put out a warning on the book club choice of The Malt Whiskey Murders. Nuff said, as per N Molesworth.
My two 'fall asleep to' books this month were Elly Griffiths' The Last Remains and Mick Herron's Slough House. Slough House is a bad choice for night time drowsing as there are some very tense moments in it which, even though I have read the book several times, I still find very difficult to listen to. But not, you know, so difficult that I don't! Fall asleep books have to be ones I've listened to before so that I have some way of finding the point at which I fell asleep the previous night and picking up from there. I usually put the timer on to 15 or 30 minutes, but that's less help than you might think!
After that we have The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennet. I'd seen this favourably reviewed by crime and fantasy reviewers since it is a crime novel set in an imagined world. I didn't enjoy it held as much as I thought I would. The murder mystery was fine as far as it went although I thought the author cheated a bit by making the central murders and their solution reliant on the particular oddities of his world. It's tricky to explain, but it seemed to me, and I may be wrong, that he made some things up as he went along, rather than having thought out the basic parameters of the way his world differed from the one we live in, just to make his life easier. A sort of 'oh if I say this is a thing, even if it's on page 201 and not previously mentioned then x can do y and therefore discover z'. I didn't take to either of the two main protagonists, and it seemed a novel driven almost entirely by the mechanics of (admittedly slick) plot, and not development, or even display of character. That said, it's not a bad book, goodness knows I have encountered much worse, and if you like crime fiction or imagined worlds, it's probably worth a look.
Finally we have I Who Have Never Known Men by Josephine Harpman and which was recommended to me by a friend as 'thought provoking'. This one was the cause of the ' ' above, because I have to confess I didn't listen to it all. I got about 2/3rds of the way through, some of that at 1.5 speed to make it go quicker. I then skipped to the last 20 minutes. And that was a mistake because in a novel that was outstandingly bleak the final few pages were the bleakest of all. I know that the author probably wanted to say interesting things about what makes life meaningful and how communities work and the value of knowing things, but when you boil it down, she didn't. If you are any more curious about it, I refer you to the Amazon plot precis and then in particular to the 1-3 star reviews. The reviews will a least raise a smile, which is more than the book did.













